So many concurrent users may experience a slowdown of a compute-heavy app when hosted using Shiny-server. Many instances of an app that demands a lot of memory will drain your server resources faster if it is hosted using ShinyProxy vs Shiny-server.ĬPU: Multiple instances of the same app will share the same R instance and processor thread in Shiny-server. Memory: Shiny-server can share memory between multiple instances of the same app while each instance of a ShinyProxy app is completely independent. The most cost-efficient option will be the first option in this list that meets all of your needs: (1) shinyapps.io, (2) shiny-server (free), (3) ShinyProxy, (4) Shiny-server Pro. ShinyProxy: takes even longer to setup, requires a server, experience with Docker, very capable.shiny-server: takes longer to setup, requires a server, but fewer limitations.shinyapps.io: by far the cheapest, so long as it meets your needs.I have hosted apps using the three approaches listed in the table.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |